For example, suppose you keep $5,000 in your savings account. The bank has another customer request a $1,000 loan. It can use fractions of all its customer’s savings to fund that customer’s loan.
How Fractional-Reserve Banking Works
The supply of money grows when banks use funds held in accounts while simultaneously lending them out as loans. For example, when you deposit money into your account, the bank shows 100% of it in your account, but it is allowed to lend some of it to other customers. This acts to increase the amount of money in the economy. To illustrate how it works, suppose you create a brand-new economy, and you add the first $1,000 to the system.
Criticism of Fractional-Reserve Banking
Fractional-reserve banking works because people typically don’t need access to all of their money at the same time. You may have $1,000 available in your account, but it’s unlikely that you’ll withdraw all of it at once. If, for some reason, you need to withdraw all of your funds, the reserves from other customer accounts should be enough to cover your withdrawal if you do. However, if everyone in the system attempts to withdraw their money at the same time, the system can collapse. Banks do not hold enough cash in reserve to give everyone all of their cash on demand—which tends to happen when customers fear that banks will fail. This is known as a “bank run.” Due to fractional-reserve banking, bank failures during the Great Depression were catastrophic—many people lost their life savings. As a result, the Banking Act of 1933 established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which protects deposits in participating banks, up to certain limits. The FDIC provides a government guarantee that customers will get their money even if a bank’s investments go sour. Credit unions have similar coverage from the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund. Critics have likened fractional-reserve banking to a house of cards. They worry that there’s nothing to back the assets in the system and that the economy may eventually collapse. Many also fear that market participants will lose confidence in the system.
Alternatives to Fractional-Reserve Banking
The Federal Reserve is exploring the possibility of a Central Bank Digital Currency, the implementation of which might profoundly impact the fractional-reserve banking system as we know it. Another alternative to a fractional-reserve system is a full-reserve banking system in which banks would keep 100% of all deposits on hand at all times. This could apply to all deposits or only those intended for immediate cash needs, such as checking and savings accounts. However, if banks are required to hold more in reserve, then less cash will be available for lending—promoting not economic growth but shrinkage. Without fractional-reserve banking, your relationship with banks would look different. Instead of paying you interest on your deposits, banks might charge you (or charge significantly more) for their services. In the system we’re used to, banks earn revenue by putting your money to work and keeping the difference between what they charge borrowers and what they pay you as the depositor. A full-reserve system would have to find a way to compete with this set-up.
